Psicologia criminal miguel angel soria pdf

However, the scientific literature establishes that the presence of these disorders and/or symptoms is legally, not a sufficient proof of the existence of psychological damage, especially given its possible interaction with previous or associated disorders 7. In order for this to happen, the psychological assessment must establish that the alleged offence is the cause of such sequelae.ДЄlthough the psychological harm suffered by victims of a criminal act is identified by assessing its impact on their mental state 2,3, clinical reports usually assess the presence of psychological sequelae using clinical scales that mainly measure depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and similar 4-6. These cases rely on external reports, usually from public services or private organizations, to determine the existence of psychological sequelae that will be used as prosecution evidence in court. This is especially relevant nowadays, when considering that the number of criminal prosecutions for intimate partner violence (IPV) in Spain are increasing in a steady manner - up to 72.1%, from 47,262 cases in 2002 to 81,301 cases in 2007 1. Therefore, from a legal perspective, pain and suffering (regardless of any economic compensation they may entail as evidence of civil responsibility within the criminal proceedings) need to be demonstrated. Key words: Malingering Intimate partner violence Psychological injury Forensic and clinical assessment Victimization.ДЄccording to the Spanish legislation regarding intimate partner violence that came into effect in 2004 ( Ley OrgГЎnica 1/2004), psychological violence is defined as a situation in which the victim is seen to be suffering psychological distress as a result of the crime committed.

Although these tests are used extensively in clinical psychology, our study confirms that, just by themselves, they are not a reliable source of information in a forensic context. Results and Conclusions: The results of our research show that, even without previous knowledge of the scales, people can distort the test results by malingering symptoms that are normally accepted as sequelae of intimate partner violence, especially depression and low self-esteem however, the results for anxiety, were less homogeneous. The real victims underwent testing in a forensic context. The non-clinical sample was evaluated twice: the first time they gave sincere responses, and the second time they were instructed to answer as if they were victims. The sample comprised 66 women: 36 students, and 30 real victims. Methods: In the present study three scales based in a clinical setting and regularly used in a forensic context were administered (BDI, STAI and Rosenberg) to assess malingering of symptoms. The aim of the present study was to explore the effectiveness of psychopathological assessment using commonly used scales in clinical practice and whose results are presented as legal evidence in a forensic context in order to detect malingered psychological sequelae (anxiety, depression and low self-esteem) in victims of intimate partner violence in forensic contexts. Usually, the victim's pain and suffering is estimated by administering clinical scales. SpainД«ackground and Objectives: According to Spanish legislation, the psychological harm suffered by the victim of a criminal act is determined by assessing its impact on the victim's mental state. Miguel ГЃngel Soria Montserrat Yepes Inmaculada ArmadansДepartment of Social Psychology, University of Barcelona. Effectiveness of clinical assessment in Spanish forensic practice: detecting malingered psychological sequelae in victims of intimate partner violence

Psicologia criminal miguel angel soria pdf